President-elect Donald Trump promised to end the Russian-Ukrainian war in one day, all without presenting a detailed action plan.

Trump’s foreign policy is at the heart of his politics. successful bid for the White Houseas he repeatedly pledged to end the war in Ukraine and the Middle East.

“They are dying, the Russians and the Ukrainians. I want them to stop dying. And I will, I will do it in 24 hours,” Trump said in 2023 during a press conference. CNN city ​​hall.

Trump, who won the popular vote for the first time in three attempts, said Vladimir Putin would not have invaded Ukraine if he had “respected” the outgoing American president.

“If we had a real president, a president who knew, who was respected by Putin… he would never have invaded Ukraine,” Trump said during the first presidential debate against Joe Biden.

In an interview in February, on the Right Side Broadcasting Network, the former US president said the Russian invasion “would never have started” if he had stayed in the White House instead of Joe Biden.

Kurt Volker, who participated in negotiations with Ukraine and Vladimir Putin between 2017 and 2019 during the first Trump administration, said: THE Independent from Kyiv that the Republican “will call Putin as quickly as possible” and tell the Russian president that he “must stop the war.”

News week asked the artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT using the prompt: “Can Donald Trump end the war in Ukraine and explain how he plans to do so while preserving Ukrainian sovereignty?”

Donald Trump has repeatedly said he could end the war in Ukraine “within 24 hours” if re-elected, although he has not provided specific details on his approach. He suggested he could bring in both Russian President Vladimir Putin and the Ukrainian president. Volodymyr Zelensky at the negotiating table through personal diplomacy.

“Here is a closer look at what elements might be considered in his approach, as well as some of the challenges in achieving Ukrainian peace and sovereignty.

Direct negotiations with Putin and Zelensky

“Trump’s main claim is to leverage his relationships with world leaders, especially Putin. He has said he will mediate a settlement by pressuring both sides to negotiate, probably using his connections and influence to get both leaders to agree to terms they might otherwise reject.

“Both sides currently have high stakes: Ukraine seeks to regain its territory, while Russia aims to secure strategic areas like Crimea and the Donbass region. Putin’s goals for Russia in Ukraine extend beyond- beyond what any previous administration’s diplomacy could influence, because they involve long-term cooperation. Without substantial concessions or assurances, Putin may not agree to terms that would preserve Ukrainian sovereignty.

Conditional aid to Ukraine and sanctions against Russia

“He suggested that it was necessary to take advantage American military and economic aid to Ukraine as a negotiating tool. By potentially reducing U.S. support or conditioning it on Ukraine’s willingness to negotiate, he could push Zelensky toward concessions. Trump could also suggest changing sanctions against Russia to encourage its withdrawal.

“A reduction in U.S. aid would weaken Ukraine’s negotiating position. Currently, the U.S. and NATO this support gives Ukraine the means to defend its territory and resist Russian advances. Cutting aid could push Ukraine to negotiate, but could also make it more vulnerable, compromising its sovereignty. Furthermore, a push to change sanctions could embolden Putin if he perceives a weakening of U.S. resolve.

Neutral status proposed for Ukraine

“Trump could revive ideas such as a “neutral” status for Ukraine, similar to that of Finland during the Cold War. This would mean that Ukraine would not join NATO, thus meeting one of the concerns expressed by Putin regarding NATO expansion near Russian borders.

“Ukraine has shown a strong desire for NATO membership to protect itself from future aggression, and neutrality can be seen as a concession to Russian demands. This could undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty, especially if it means limiting its foreign policy decisions or military alliances in ways favorable to Moscow.

Partition or demilitarization agreements

“Some analysts believe Trump could propose dividing disputed territories, particularly Crimea and parts of Donbas, or creating demilitarized zones. He could try to negotiate deals in which Russia would retain control of some areas while withdrawing from others.

“Such agreements would directly undermine Ukrainian sovereignty, since Ukraine’s official position is to restore full control over all occupied territories, including Crimea. The partition of Ukraine would set a precedent against national sovereignty, a position unlikely to be acceptable to Ukraine or much of the international community.

Main obstacles to establishing peace while preserving sovereignty

“Russia has already annexed parts of Ukraine and is unlikely to reverse this position without a fight. Ukraine, for its part, is determined to reclaim its occupied lands.

“Trump’s approach could face resistance from NATO allies and EUbecause any plan that appears to compromise Ukraine’s sovereignty or security could face opposition from other Western countries.

“Any major changes in U.S. support for Ukraine would require congressional approval, which could be difficult given bipartisan support for Ukraine’s defense.

“In summary, while Trump may attempt a combination of direct diplomacy, conditional aid, and negotiations over Ukraine’s NATO ambitions, each of these tactics poses risks to Ukraine’s sovereignty Without clear guarantees for Ukraine’s autonomy and security, it remains possible to preserve sovereignty while ending the conflict, even with assertive diplomatic intervention.

Elina Beketova, democracy fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA), said: News week that Ukrainians hope the second Trump administration will help Ukraine negotiate from a “position of strength” in possible peace talks.

“It is difficult to say today what decisions Donald Trump will make in the near future. Everyone is waiting for further statements and developments.

“Ukraine hopes that the new administration can help repel Russian aggression and withdraw Russian troops from Ukraine’s sovereign territory.

“In my conversations with kyiv residents, they hope that the war will end not with the freezing of the current front line and the ceding of territories to Russia, but with the rejection of Russian soldiers from the sovereign territory of the Ukraine. Furthermore, we are talking about millions of people in Russia controlled territories who want to remain Ukrainians and preserve their identity.

Matthew Savill, director of military science at the defense and security think tank Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), said in a statement: “A Trump victory creates considerable uncertainty for both Ukraine and its other international partners. President Zelensky has already congratulated Trump and is no doubt hoping that the latter’s desire to be seen as a “winner” will prompt him to throw his weight behind supporting Ukraine.

“But his desire for an agreement – and probably a quick one – does not bode well for lasting American support, especially with the current pressure on Ukraine. Trump will have to deal with Congressbut there is significant skepticism about Ukraine among many Republicans.